<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Forum Look: vbFraxi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pligg.com/blog/125/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pligg.com/blog/125/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/</link>
	<description>Pligg is a Social Netoworking Content Management System that lets many users submit and rate news items.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gojal</title>
		<link>http://www.pligg.com/blog/125/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/#comment-10711</link>
		<dc:creator>gojal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pligg.com/blog/2007/09/08/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/#comment-10711</guid>
		<description>Show me a single site that used Pligg 9.6 and could make it XHTML compliant? There are issues like open Img tags and absmiddle (http://forums.pligg.com/off-topic/5617-align-absmiddle-somethig-else.html). AFAIR some codes were produced from PHP files in libs folder so no template could make them XHTML compliant. Did you ever see invalid CSS files used in different Pligg modules? One example is thickbox.css. Before running some validation robot, think how the site was built.

I have no idea idea of Moonrank but I am big fan of Pligg site. We do not expect someone be so direct without any Pligg knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Show me a single site that used Pligg 9.6 and could make it XHTML compliant? There are issues like open Img tags and absmiddle (http://forums.pligg.com/off-topic/5617-align-absmiddle-somethig-else.html). AFAIR some codes were produced from PHP files in libs folder so no template could make them XHTML compliant. Did you ever see invalid CSS files used in different Pligg modules? One example is thickbox.css. Before running some validation robot, think how the site was built.</p>
<p>I have no idea idea of Moonrank but I am big fan of Pligg site. We do not expect someone be so direct without any Pligg knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fairmay</title>
		<link>http://www.pligg.com/blog/125/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/#comment-10653</link>
		<dc:creator>fairmay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pligg.com/blog/2007/09/08/new-forum-look-vbfraxi/#comment-10653</guid>
		<description>Is there any particular reason why moonrank.com decided against making the new themes on the mainpage, blog and forums not comply with w3c standards as there are lots of XHTML errors, The CSS is not valid either guys i would get moonrank is back to work ASAP as it's a half finished job by them.

Hopefully you haven't paid moonrank in full yet if you have that's unfortunate but happens to all sites at one time or another, where you pay for a service that isnt up to standard. A good tip is to pay developers in installments with the last being paid on delivery and satisfaction of a job well done.

Nice new look though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any particular reason why moonrank.com decided against making the new themes on the mainpage, blog and forums not comply with w3c standards as there are lots of XHTML errors, The CSS is not valid either guys i would get moonrank is back to work ASAP as it&#8217;s a half finished job by them.</p>
<p>Hopefully you haven&#8217;t paid moonrank in full yet if you have that&#8217;s unfortunate but happens to all sites at one time or another, where you pay for a service that isnt up to standard. A good tip is to pay developers in installments with the last being paid on delivery and satisfaction of a job well done.</p>
<p>Nice new look though :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
